November 24, 2014

Agricultural Economy; Regulations; and, Political Notes

Agricultural Economy

Bloomberg writers Megan Durisin and Whitney McFerron reported yesterday that, “Corn and soybeans fell in Chicago on speculation that dry weather will accelerate harvests that are forecast to be the biggest ever in the U.S., the world’s top producer of the crops.

“Farmers collected about 83 percent of soybeans in the main growing areas as of yesterday, up from 70 percent last week and behind last year’s 86 percent, according to a Bloomberg survey. The corn harvest was at 61 percent, up from 46 percent last week and behind last year’s 73 percent. Much of the western and central Midwest, including top producers Iowa and Illinois, will get less than 1 inch (2.5 centimeters) of rain in the next seven days, National Weather Service data show.”

The article explained that, “Corn futures for December delivery fell 0.9 percent to close at $3.735 a bushel at 1:15 p.m. on the Chicago Board of Trade, the biggest decline for a most-active contract since Oct. 24. The grain rallied 17 percent last month, the most since July 2012, as rain delayed the harvest in the U.S.

Soybean futures for January delivery fell 1.9 percent to $10.2975 a bushel, the largest decrease since Oct. 10. The oilseed jumped 15 percent last month, the most since July 2012. Soybean-meal futures for December delivery fell 4.2 percent to $372.70 per 2,000 pounds today. Prices surged 11 percent last week amid bottlenecks on U.S. railways.”


Ag Economy; Trade; Biotech; Policy Issues; Biofuels; and, Climate

Agricultural Economy- Farm Income, Prices, and, Cost Variables

Marcia Zarley Taylor reported on Friday at DTN that, “A Halloween forecast by Purdue University paints a grim outlook for the grain economy through at least 2015, and possibly the next three or four years.

Indiana grain farm incomes are expected to tumble 30% in 2014 and another 35% in 2015, even including government payments under the new farm bill, Purdue Economist Chris Hurt said. He gauges the state’s grain incomes at $1.1 billion for 2015, down from the recent high of $3.4 billion in 2011.”

The DTN article noted that, “In a webinar on the changing business climate for agriculture, Hurt and other Purdue economists emphasized that cash rents and farm input costs have been slow to adjust to the new realities of commodity markets. The main problem is that production costs need to fall by about 20% to realign with the current price outlook.

The crop production system could be vulnerable for the next three or four years and possibly beyond that, Hurt said. ‘We have a cost structure that’s built on $5 corn and $12 soybeans, but the reality is the market is only going to offer $4 corn and $9 to $10 soybeans,’ Hurt said. ‘For some growers it will mean trauma or failure, but most will make the adjustments, given enough time.’”


Video: Availability Key to Crop Insurance’s Future

Categories: Farm Bill

From National Crop Insurance Services, Oct. 31, 2014- Crop insurance providers today released the first in a series of educational videos meant to highlight three policy attributes that are essential to maintaining a strong crop insurance system in the face of future market and weather challenges.

The first three-minute segment examines the widespread availability of crop insurance, whereas future videos will look at the affordability of policies and the viability of private-sector delivery.

Congress cemented crop insurance’s role as the centerpiece of the farm safety net during the 2014 Farm Bill,” explained Tom Zacharias, president of National Crop Insurance Services, the trade group that sponsored the video series. “However, that safety net will collapse if crop insurance policies aren’t widely available, aren’t affordable to producers, and aren’t economically viable to be administered by efficient private insurance providers.”

According to the first video, “Crop insurance is similar to other kinds of insurance. The more people who purchase policies, the more people who help share risk. And when risk can be spread out along a broader base, it helps lower the cost for everyone.”

That is why it is it is so important for insurance to be available for all kinds of crops and to farmers of all sizes and backgrounds, NCIS noted.

The more the merrier. From corn and cotton to cherries and canola, every single acre enrolled helps strengthen the whole system,” the video explained.

The recently passed Farm Bill took big steps to make crop insurance more available to beginning farmers, organic producers, and fruit and vegetable growers. Lawmakers also stopped legislative attempts to reduce insurance benefits available to larger farms – a plan that would have raised costs on all farmers and increased taxpayers’ risk exposure.

Congress got it right by making crop insurance more widely available and stronger than ever. Now, we just need to keep it that way,” the video concluded. “After all, not everyone farms, but everyone eats. So everyone depends on a strong farm policy.”

Trade; Policy Issues; Ag Economy; Biotech; and, Regulations


Vicki Needham reported yesterday at The Hill Online that, “The nation’s top trade official said Thursday that a final agreement on a massive Asia-Pacific deal won’t be in the offing next month.

“U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman confirmed that, as expected, a Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement won’t be announced at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit next month in Beijing.”

The Hill update indicated that, “‘No. We do not expect to have a final agreement on TPP at APEC,’ Froman said at the Washington Ideas Forum in Washington.

“‘APEC will be an opportunity when all the TPP leaders will be present, so it’s a good opportunity for them to have conversations with each other about TPP and about whatever outstanding issues are left, and give more political impetus to getting it done.’”


Ag Economy; Biotech; Policy Issues; and, Regulations

Agricultural Economy- Trade

Reuters News reported yesterday that, “U.S. businesses urged President Barack Obama on Wednesday to make a case for fast-track authority on trade agreements before his upcoming trip to Asia, which is seen as an opportunity to push a Pacific trade deal.

“Myron Brilliant, head of international affairs for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said Obama should send a signal about trade in the time between mid-term U.S. elections on Nov. 4 and an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in China on Nov. 10-11.

“A bipartisan bill on so-called trade promotion authority (TPA), which allows lawmakers to set priorities for trade deals in return for a yes-or-no vote, was introduced in Congress in January but has not progressed to a vote.”


Trade; Ag Economy; Biotech; Regulations; and, Policy Issues

Trade Issues

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service (ERS) released a report yesterday titled, “Agriculture in the Trans-Pacific Partnership,” which stated in part that, “The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a trade and investment agreement under negotiation by 12 countries in the Pacific Rim, including the United States. This report assesses the potential impacts of eliminating all agricultural and nonagricultural tariffs and tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) under a TPP agreement on the region’s agriculture in 2025—the assumed end date of the pact’s implementation—compared with baseline values for 2025 without a TPP. Cutting tariffs is only one of the many goals of the TPP negotiations, but it is an important one for agricultural trade. The value of intraregional agricultural trade in 2025 under a tariff- free, TRQ-free scenario is estimated to be 6 percent, or about $8.5 billion higher (in 2007 U.S. dollars) compared with baseline values. U.S. agricultural exports to the region will be 5 percent, or about $3 billion higher, and U.S. agricultural imports from the region in 2025 will be 2 percent, or $1 billion higher in value compared with the baseline.”

The ERS report also noted that, “While each member country will experience growth in both its agricultural imports and exports, Japan and the United States will account for the largest shares of the increases in intraregional imports and exports, respectively. The United States will supply about 33 percent of the expansion in intraregional agricultural exports—the value of U.S. agricultural exports to TPP partners in 2025 is estimated to be 5 percent ($2.8 billion) higher under the TPP scenario than in the baseline. Japan will account for almost 70 percent of the expansion in intraregional agricultural imports—the value of Japan’s agricultural imports from its TPP partners in 2025 is expected to be about 14 percent ($5.8 billion) higher than in the baseline.”


Trade; Ag Economy; and, Regulations

Trade Issues

Reuters news reported yesterday that, “Mexico and the United States reached a deal on Monday to avert potentially steep duties on Mexican sugar imports to the United States, defusing a months-long dispute that threatened to escalate into a major trade war.

“In the deal hammered out hours before U.S. regulators were going to slap penalties on Mexican imports, the U.S. Department of Commerce said that Mexican and U.S. officials and Mexican sugar exporters initialed a draft agreement that would suspend both anti-subsidy and anti-dumping duties on the goods, if adopted in full.

“The deal included provisions that will prevent imports from being concentrated during certain times of the year, limit the amount of refined sugar that may enter the U.S. market and establish minimum price mechanisms to guard against undercutting or keeping U.S. prices artificially low, it said.”


Ag Economy; Biotech; C.O.O.L; and, Political Notes

Agricultural Economy

University of Illinois agricultural economist Gary Schnitkey indicated on Friday at the farmdoc daily blog (“Cash Deficits Projected for Corn in 2014 and 2015”) that, “In Tuesday’s article (farmdoc daily, October 21, 2014), gross revenue from corn was projected to be much lower in 2014 and 2015 than in 2011 through 2013. Total costs are compared to gross revenues in this article. For cash rent farmland, total costs are projected higher than gross revenue in 2014 and 2015. Projected losses are over $100 per acre in 2014 and 2015 [related graph].”

The farmdoc update noted that, “Given a cash rent situation, losses are projected for both 2014 and 2015. A -$109 per acre loss is projected for 2014 and a -$143 loss is projected for 2015. These are large losses from a historical standpoint. The only other time that a loss occurred since 2000 was in 2009. In 2009, gross revenue minus total costs equaled -$21 per acre.”


Regulations; Policy Issues; Ag Economy; Biotech; and, Political Notes


Tim Devaney reported yesterday at The Hill Online that, “The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) water rule passed a crucial test Thursday, gaining the approval of the agency’s internal review board.

“The EPA’s Science Advisory Board noted in a peer review of the rule that there is ‘strong scientific support’ for the agency’s proposed Waters of the U.S. regulation.”


Ag Economy; Policy Issues; Biotech; Biofuels; and, Political Notes

Agricultural Economy

Marcia Zarley Taylor reported yesterday at the DTN Minding Ag’s Business blog that, “Given the abrupt drop in commodity prices this year, ‘the solvency of some farm customers could shift quickly,’ David Lynn, a senior vice president for Farm Credit Mid-America cautioned ag economists attending a conference in Louisville this month.

“Indeed, University of Illinois economists now estimates 2014 gross revenues in northern Illinois will run about $300/acre below the 2011-2013 average of $1,100/acre. That’s even counting robust yields, which won’t totally compensate for the steep collapse in corn prices this season. Projections for 2015 look worse, although it’s still early in the process.

“Lynn urges his association’s 97,000 farm customers to be proactive about this reversal of fortune and to develop habits that will persuade lenders they remain good long-term risks, even if potential 2014 and 2015 losses reflect a temporary setback.”


Farm Bill; Ag Economy; and, Regulations

Farm Bill

Chris Clayton reported yesterday at DTN that, “A provision to exclude yields from Actual Production History for farmers affected by severe weather will go into effect for some select spring crops in 2015, USDA announced Tuesday.

USDA’s rollout comes too late to boost insurance coverage for winter-wheat producers who have been some of the most vocal proponents of the provision. Some wheat growers could pursue litigation over the department’s delayed implementation.

“The provision for the 2014 farm bill essentially waives Actual Production History yields that collapsed due to extreme weather. The APH exclusion would adjust a farmer’s actual yields for crop insurance in counties where the average planted-acre yield tumbled at least 50% below a 10-year county average. Under the provision, farmers could exclude yields for up to six years of crops. Growers in contiguous counties would also qualify.”


Trade Issues- Ag Economy; Policy Issues; Biotech; Regs; and, Political Notes

Trade Issues (COOL)- Agricultural Economy

DTN Ag Policy Editor Chris Clayton reported yesterday that, “Congress and the Obama administration will once again have to decide whether labeling meat with the country of origin is worth the trade headaches it causes.

“The World Trade Organization publicly released its latest ruling Monday on the U.S. Country of Origin Labeling law and rule by USDA. The global trade panel found that changes made to COOL in 2013 by USDA actually made livestock trade between the U.S., Canada and Mexico more difficult.

The ruling is a victory not only for Canada and Mexico, but U.S. meatpackers that have long opposed labeling the origin of meat products at retailers. Opponents of the law urged both the Obama administration and Congress to eliminate the rule or change it.”


Policy Issues; Ag Economy; Regulations; Biotech; and, Biofuels

Policy Issues

DTN Ag Policy Editor Chris Clayton reported on Friday that, “Without giving any indication how the next World Trade Organization ruling on Country of Origin Labeling will come down, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said Thursday the COOL decision could become public within a few weeks, if not days.

“Vilsack spent Thursday with his Mexican counterpart, Enrique Martinez, secretary of fisheries and agriculture, showing Martinez some climate research facilities at Iowa State University before holding a joint forum at the 2014 World Food Prize Borlaug Dialogue.

“In a press conference late Thursday afternoon, Martinez said through an interpreter that the ruling on COOL would affect producers in both countries. Martinez also noted the U.S. Congress created the law to label the country of origin for meat.”


ERS: Global stocks of major crops rising


From USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS)- “Global stocks of major crop commodities are forecast to expand in the 2014/15 marketing year, with total stocks of wheat, rice, corn, and soybeans completing recovery from the relatively low levels that preceded the 2008 spike in world crop prices. Record U.S. crops of corn and soybeans, along with good harvest by some other major producing countries, are forecast to push both U.S. and global stocks of these commodities to record levels. World wheat stocks are forecast to rise based on the outlook for record or near-record harvests by major foreign producers, including China, the EU, India, and the Former Soviet Union. While world rice stocks are forecast below peak levels of the early 2000s, good harvests and ample stocks are expected across the major producing regions in Asia. The supply outlook is expected to lead to lower commodity prices, with the average U.S. farm prices of corn (-24 percent), soybeans (-23 percent), wheat (-14 percent), and rice (-10 percent) all forecast down in their respective 2014/15 marketing years compared with 2013/14. Find additional analysis in the current editions of Feed Grain Outlook, Oil Crops Outlook, Wheat Outlook, and Rice Outlook.”


Ag Economy; Farm Bill; Regulations; and, Climate

Agricultural Economy

Yesterday, the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri provided an update on crop price projections reflecting information available in mid-October.

A summary of the FAPRI update indicated that, “The projected corn price for the 2014/15 marketing year was reduced slightly this month, to $3.40 per bushel. The record U.S. corn crop got even bigger in USDA’s October estimates, and carry-in stocks were also greater than had been estimated in September.

“Corn acreage could decline in 2015, and more typical growing conditions would result in lower yields next year. Projected prices increase to $3.74 per bushel for 2015/16, and to $4.20 per bushel by 2018/19.”

Yesterday’s update added that, “USDA soybean production estimates also increased slightly this month, but this was offset by a reduction in carry-in stocks, leaving total supplies marginally reduced from September estimates. The projected 2014/15 soybean price is little changed from last month, at $9.95 per bushel.

“Soybean acreage could stay near this year’s record in 2015 and the resulting large soybean supplies cause projected 2015/16 prices to drop to $8.93 per bushel, before recovering to $10.50 per bushel by 2018/19.”


Ag Economy; Policy Issues; Regulations; Biofuels; and, Climate

Agricultural Economy

Yesterday, the Federal Reserve Board released its Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions. Commonly referred to as the “Beige Book,” the report included several observations with respect to the U.S. agricultural economy. A summary of the ag related comments can be found here, at Online.

In part, yesterday’s report noted that, “Lower corn prices continued to benefit poultry and livestock producers that rely on corn for feed” (Atlanta District); “Livestock and dairy producers continued to benefit from lower feed costs and high output prices” (Minneapolis District); “Cattle prices continued to be at a record high while feed prices fell, boosting profitability for cattle producers” (Dallas District) and “low corn prices and stable fertilizer and machinery prices benefited dairy and feedlot operations” (San Francisco District).

The Chicago District noted that, “Crop income was lower than a year ago as higher yields were insufficient to offset lower prices. Crop insurance will cover some of the lost income, but farmers already are planning to trim costs for next year, particularly spending on farm equipment and other capital purchases.”

And the Kansas City District added that, “Crop insurance and some pre-selling of this year’s crop at higher prices earlier in the year may help mitigate the effect on overall farm incomes of recent spot price declinesThe demand for farm operating loans has risen substantially from last year as more crop producers borrowed to pay for operating costs. Bankers also reported a rise in requests for agricultural loan renewals and extensions and noted that loan repayment rates have edged down from the high levels seen the past few years. Despite the sharp drop in crop prices, farmland values were typically holding at high levels.”


« Past Entries Recent Entries »